RESISTANCE TO SCOURGE®
INSECTICIDE IN THE MOSQUITO POPULATIONS OF FOUR TOWNS IN THE CENTRAL MASS.
MOSQUITO CONTROL PROJECT SERVICE AREA: WESTBOROUGH, BILLERICA, TEWKSBURY, AND
WILMINGTON
ANN G.
PARSLEY, Research Technician & TIMOTHY D. DESCHAMPS, Executive Director
Central
Mass. Mosquito Control Project
111 Otis
Street Northborough, Massachusetts 01532
ABSTRACT
The Central Massachusetts Mosquito
Control Project (CMMCP) has been using a synthetic pyrethroid called resmethrin,
trade name Scourge®, since the early 1990’s to control adult mosquito
populations in its service area. The
current CMMCP policy is to accept service requests from residents and town
officials for adult mosquito control and to perform limited, targeted
applications, and not perform random, area-wide spraying as was the standard
procedure for adult mosquito control in Massachusetts decades ago. As part of
our Standard Operating Procedures manual and as a function of an Integrated
Mosquito Management (IMM) plan, surveillance is analyzed before any product is
applied to justify the application. This can be in the form of landing rate
counts or data collected from mosquito traps. Resistance to a class of
chemicals has been noted in other areas of the world, and we will attempt to
determine if any mosquito species or any collections of mosquitoes from a given
area will show resistance to the synthetic pyrethroid class of chemicals. If
resistance is noted, this may affect the product choice for vector-borne
disease control, as well as the reduction of nuisance levels of mosquitoes.
Initial results from 2005 show a minor potential for resistance, but no change
in product usage is recommended at this time.
There is no indication that resistance levels will increase due to the
limited, sporadic nature of the CMMCP adulticide program, but further study
would be prudent.
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this
study was to determine whether or not resistance to resmethrin was developing in
the mosquito populations at the most frequently sprayed properties. If significant resistance were present, it
could necessitate changing from resmethrin to a different product registered in
Massachusetts and accepted by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for
mosquito control. This would be
particularly important in the case of an outbreak of mosquito-borne diseases
such as West Nile Virus (WNV) or Eastern Equine Encephalitis (EEE). If a particular species of mosquito or a
mosquito collection from a given area has been shown to be resistant to the
pyrethroid class of chemicals, then vector suppression may need to be done
using different products and procedures. The towns of Westborough, Billerica,
Tewksbury and Wilmington were chosen for the study because these are the only
towns in the CMMCP service area where WNV or EEE have been found either in
mosquitoes, horses or humans. WNV was
found in a collection of mosquitoes in Westborough in 2003, and that same year
a woman in the area of the virus positive mosquito also contracted WNV. Horses in Billerica and Wilmington were
identified to have been infected with EEE in 2004, and mosquitoes positive for
EEE were found in Tewksbury in 2002.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Five study sites were
chosen in each town, from among the most frequently sprayed properties in the
town according to the CMMCP database of service requests. The frequency of spraying was determined from
a database of spray requests from 1998 to the present. Because the towns vary in their overall
mosquito population and the number of requests is determined by the property
owners, no two sites had exactly the same number of requests in each
season. The number of spray requests
varied considerably. The most frequently
sprayed property had been sprayed 38 times over the eight year period, while
the least frequently sprayed property had only been sprayed four times, all in
2004. Most of the properties had been
sprayed between 12 and 25 times since 1998.
All but two of the properties were at private homes; one was a public
recreational area, and another was a wetland area at the end of a
cul-de-sac. The cul-de-sac site was
chosen because at that site mosquitoes had been found to be positive for West
Nile in 2003 and this was in the neighborhood of the human WNV case in 2003.
A control site was
chosen in the town of Westborough in a swamp bordering an organic farm. This site has never been sprayed for
mosquitoes by CMMCP, and to the best of our knowledge the town and the property
owners did not apply any insecticides in that area. It was presumed that mosquitoes from this
site would have no resistance to resmethrin having never been exposed to any
insecticides.
At each site, live
adult mosquitoes were collected using two CDC-style traps (John W. Hock
Company) baited with carbon dioxide at 20 psi.
The traps were set early in the morning and collected the following
morning. Traps were set for one or two
nights, depending on how many mosquitoes were collected. The number of mosquitoes tested for each site
varied from 30 to 152; for most sites it was approximately 50.
The resistance
testing was conducted according to the bottle bioassay procedure described by
Brogdon and McAllister1.
Scourge® insecticide (18% Resmethrin + 54% piperonyl butoxide synergist,
lot no. 465-0815) manufactured by Bayer Environmental Science Company was
diluted in acetone to make a 0.005% solution, and was evenly applied to coat
the insides of 250ml Wheaton bottles (Fisher Scientific Company). Each bottle was coated with 1ml of acetone
and 1ml of Scourge solution, containing 9.05 mg of resmethrin and 27.02 mg of
piperonyl butoxide. This dosage was determined by testing seven batches of
mosquitoes from the control site with Scourge/acetone solutions of different
strengths. Controls consisted of bottles coated only with acetone.
After the mosquitoes
were aspirated from the trap cage and introduced into the coated bottles, each
bottle was checked at five-minute intervals, and the number of mosquitoes
knocked down was recorded. A mosquito
was considered knocked down if it could not regain a standing position when
knocked off its feet by gently tapping or shaking the bottle. Knock-down was chosen as the standard rather
than overall mortality because resmethrin may cause the mosquitoes to twitch
even after they are dead, making the time of death difficult to determine
exactly.
RESULTS
No mosquitoes were
knocked down in the acetone-only control bottles. The mosquitoes from the
unsprayed control site were all knocked down within ten minutes, with 96%
knocked down after only five minutes.
The mosquitoes from
the recreational area site survived the longest, reaching 100% knocked down
only at 35 minutes. At one other site,
100% were knocked down at 25 minutes. At
twelve sites, 100% were knocked down at 20 minutes, and at six sites, 100% were
knocked down at 15 minutes. Sample
graphs are included in this presentation, and all data is available on the
CMMCP website at http://www.cmmcp.org/2005resistance.htm.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
At all of the study
sites, the mosquitoes survived longer than those from the control site. The majority of the samples contained some
individual mosquitoes that survived at least twice as long as the control
mosquitoes. This would seem to indicate
that some resistance to resmethrin may be developing in the populations
surveyed.
However, another
bottle bioassay study of resistance to various insecticides, including resmethrin,
found resistant mosquitoes surviving for up to three hours.2 In
comparison, mosquitoes that survive for 20 to 35 minutes do not seem to be very
resistant to resmethrin. If resistance
is developing in the CMMCP service area, it appears to be at an early
stage. A change of insecticide is not
recommended at this time, although continued monitoring of resistance would be
a wise course of action. Greater
resistance could develop at a later date.
REFERENCES
1.
Brogdon WG and McAllister JC. Simplification
of adult mosquito bioassays through use of time-mortality determinations in
glass bottles. J Am Mosq Control Assoc
14:159-164 (1998).
2.
McAbee RD, Kang KD, Stanich MA, et al.
Pyrethroid tolerance in Culex
pipiens pipiens var molestus from
Marin County, California. Pest Manag Sci
60:359-368 (2003).




















